<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for eisber's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eisber.net/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog</link>
	<description>my personal-tech-project's journey log</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disable host check/ping in nagios by Lawrence Kesteloot</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/138/comment-page-1#comment-24402</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Kesteloot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=138#comment-24402</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing that, it just solved my problem!

By the way, instead of deleting the check_command line, you probably want to override it with another in the host itself, such as with check_http.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing that, it just solved my problem!</p>
<p>By the way, instead of deleting the check_command line, you probably want to override it with another in the host itself, such as with check_http.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia Mail for Exchange, Exchange and Client Certificates by Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/106/comment-page-1#comment-19971</link>
		<dc:creator>Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=106#comment-19971</guid>
		<description>I follow these steps.. and fall in the same situation.

3 messages about username and pwd, with no sucess on E71.

Using the same procedute on N900 works like a charm, to me seems there is some issue on MFE, I tried 2.7, 2.9 and 3.x.. includind the last one.

All work fine on E71 until my company decides change to cert auth.

I don&#039;t have administrative rights to these servers.. some clue ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow these steps.. and fall in the same situation.</p>
<p>3 messages about username and pwd, with no sucess on E71.</p>
<p>Using the same procedute on N900 works like a charm, to me seems there is some issue on MFE, I tried 2.7, 2.9 and 3.x.. includind the last one.</p>
<p>All work fine on E71 until my company decides change to cert auth.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have administrative rights to these servers.. some clue ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disable host check/ping in nagios by Ozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/138/comment-page-1#comment-15169</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=138#comment-15169</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I did what you suggested and restarted the nagios. It worked well.  Thank you for the suggestion.

It is good that I am not receiving for &quot;host down&quot; status but the hosts are still in red at the nagios web interface and they &quot;seem&quot; down. All my service checks are green and working well.

Do you know if it is possible to change the red background colors to normal one, gray?

Thank you so much.

/Ozzy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I did what you suggested and restarted the nagios. It worked well.  Thank you for the suggestion.</p>
<p>It is good that I am not receiving for &#8220;host down&#8221; status but the hosts are still in red at the nagios web interface and they &#8220;seem&#8221; down. All my service checks are green and working well.</p>
<p>Do you know if it is possible to change the red background colors to normal one, gray?</p>
<p>Thank you so much.</p>
<p>/Ozzy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ORF 1/2 HD (DVB-S2) in Windows 7 Media Center *working* by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-14227</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=147#comment-14227</guid>
		<description>I currently use TechniSAT, which actually works best across receivers.
I also have 3x CryptoWorks irdeto module. They look all the same, but only 2 work with ORF HD. Depending on the receiver (e.g. Panasonic, Kathrein,...) I either have no ORF1 HD or just video without audio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently use TechniSAT, which actually works best across receivers.<br />
I also have 3x CryptoWorks irdeto module. They look all the same, but only 2 work with ORF HD. Depending on the receiver (e.g. Panasonic, Kathrein,&#8230;) I either have no ORF1 HD or just video without audio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ORF 1/2 HD (DVB-S2) in Windows 7 Media Center *working* by Aistleitner</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-14225</link>
		<dc:creator>Aistleitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=147#comment-14225</guid>
		<description>Hello!

Which CAModul did you use for the ORF-card?

thanks for answer.

Ng</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>Which CAModul did you use for the ORF-card?</p>
<p>thanks for answer.</p>
<p>Ng</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on nagios, speedfan und sfsnmp by david burns</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/143/comment-page-1#comment-12774</link>
		<dc:creator>david burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/143#comment-12774</guid>
		<description>Hi
I&#039;ve gotten speedfan on my W2003 server now running as a service, the speedfan snmp add-on working and I can run snmpwalk from the nagios box and I get the correct results.  Just can&#039;t get the check_sfan.pl nagios plugin to work.  I have some notes if it&#039;s of any help.  David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I&#8217;ve gotten speedfan on my W2003 server now running as a service, the speedfan snmp add-on working and I can run snmpwalk from the nagios box and I get the correct results.  Just can&#8217;t get the check_sfan.pl nagios plugin to work.  I have some notes if it&#8217;s of any help.  David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia Mail for Exchange, Exchange and Client Certificates by Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/106/comment-page-1#comment-12134</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=106#comment-12134</guid>
		<description>Hi people - This helps a lot but I think I am stuck at the last step. I have imported the certificate. Howeve, we use hidden lan in our company and hence I defined an access point for that. Do you know how I can configure that access point so that Mail For Exchange can use it?

Thanks,
Amit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi people &#8211; This helps a lot but I think I am stuck at the last step. I have imported the certificate. Howeve, we use hidden lan in our company and hence I defined an access point for that. Do you know how I can configure that access point so that Mail For Exchange can use it?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Amit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia Mail for Exchange, Exchange and Client Certificates by scifferous</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/106/comment-page-1#comment-11531</link>
		<dc:creator>scifferous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=106#comment-11531</guid>
		<description>I got it working right with TMG2010 and Exchange 2007.
Nokia E71 with certificate for authentication. I noticed that the password that you setup in MFE is not relevant as the ISA is setup to authenticate via the certificate and afterwards it handles everything with Kerberos delegation.

The only problem left is the anoying popup message that shows up on every connection to the ISA, &quot;User Authentication Required&quot;. It waits for an O.K and it is realy anoying when connected always or scheduled (On manual the user initiate so it&#039;s not a problem).

Anyone was able to get over that anoying message by any chance?

Thanks,
Scifferous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got it working right with TMG2010 and Exchange 2007.<br />
Nokia E71 with certificate for authentication. I noticed that the password that you setup in MFE is not relevant as the ISA is setup to authenticate via the certificate and afterwards it handles everything with Kerberos delegation.</p>
<p>The only problem left is the anoying popup message that shows up on every connection to the ISA, &#8220;User Authentication Required&#8221;. It waits for an O.K and it is realy anoying when connected always or scheduled (On manual the user initiate so it&#8217;s not a problem).</p>
<p>Anyone was able to get over that anoying message by any chance?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Scifferous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Updating Intel SSD (X18-M in my case) using USB Flash Drive by Question about SSD, HDs and Win7 - Page 4 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/127/comment-page-1#comment-11320</link>
		<dc:creator>Question about SSD, HDs and Win7 - Page 4 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/?p=127#comment-11320</guid>
		<description>[...] brought me here and here     __________________ Work in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brought me here and here     __________________ Work in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SSL secured IIS-hosted WCF Application using OpenSSL by THS</title>
		<link>http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/58/comment-page-1#comment-11113</link>
		<dc:creator>THS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisber.net/blog/archives/58#comment-11113</guid>
		<description>im already follow your stepbystep.(not including wireshark)
now if im accessing my website in my IIS, it wont open
the error is:
&quot;The page must be viewed over a secure channel&quot;

although im already check the &quot;Use SSL 2.0&quot; and 3.0 on my browser, it happen again and again.
so what do i do??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im already follow your stepbystep.(not including wireshark)<br />
now if im accessing my website in my IIS, it wont open<br />
the error is:<br />
&#8220;The page must be viewed over a secure channel&#8221;</p>
<p>although im already check the &#8220;Use SSL 2.0&#8243; and 3.0 on my browser, it happen again and again.<br />
so what do i do??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

